Informazioni scambio
Ripristinato
| Informazioni | |
|---|---|
| Inizio della trattativa | 2021-01-02- 11:20 |
| Fine della trattativa | 2021-01-02- 16:13 |
| Livello delle restrizioni | |
|
Aurėlijus Lilenas | |||
| Stipendio: | 13047 Eu | |||
| Contratto: | 1 Stag. | Età: | 24 a. | |
| RT: | 256 | Altezza: | 203 cm. | |
| Potenziale: | 9 | |||
|
Kemen Herencia
|
|||
| Stipendio: | 11589 Eu | |||
| Contratto: | 4 Stag. | Età: | 26 a. | |
| RT: | 239 | Altezza: | 196 cm. | |
| Potenziale: | 6 | |||
5.13
Scambio/Prestito giocatori:
+0
Mostra risposte nascoste: 4
Lo scambio e'stato reinvertito dal comitato fairplay
--
79 Stag.
27 g.
--
(Traduzione)
(Traduzione EN)
+0
Il comitato Fair Play ha deciso che questo commercio è scorretto ed entrambe le squadre sono state punite.
--
79 Stag.
27 g.
--
(Traduzione)
(Traduzione EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 1<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
4 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Same trade was rejected few days ago by FTC. Troll FTC should not be an option<br />
--- club was advised to add some youngsters to make a deal equal, but did not listen to fpc recommendations<br />
-- 79 Stag. 27 g.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 1<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
4 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Same trade was rejected few days ago by FTC. Troll FTC should not be an option<br />
--- club was advised to add some youngsters to make a deal equal, but did not listen to fpc recommendations<br />
-- 79 Stag. 27 g.
--
(Traduzione)
(Traduzione EN)
+0
