Trade information
Reverted
Information | |
---|---|
Start of negotiation | 2018-12-08- 18:48 |
End of negotiation | 2018-12-08- 19:10 |
Restrictions' level |
|
Juris Cekuls | |||
Salary: | 14978 Eu | |||
Contract: | 3 S | Age: | 27 y. | |
RT: | 286 | Height: | 169 cm. | |
Potential: | 8 | |||
|
Hsin-An Chen | |||
Salary: | 11685 Eu | |||
Contract: | 4 S | Age: | 25 y. | |
RT: | 253 | Height: | 215 cm. | |
Potential: | 5 |
|
Andreas Chantland | |||
Salary: | 20500 Eu | |||
Contract: | 3 S | Age: | 29 y. | |
RT: | 297 | Height: | 197 cm. | |
Potential: | 3 |
+0
Show hidden replies: 28
As far as good, I was using your definitions of good (your other game) and him saying he would lose another good player,to me none are good but I am sure they are to some WL4 teams. The best point I make in this is that either way he loses 2 players that were deemed good by the two of you for a player that will get cut due to bankruptcy anyways. So now really appears to be a gift of 2 players.
--
67 S
31 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Rules:
5) You are not allowed to just give away the “unnecessary” players to other clubs (you are not allowed to make any gifts, etc.). If you want to get rid of a player, you have to fire him.
6) All exchanges with a club, that is bogus (a club that is about to be closed, a club that is made for “trash” storage, a club which exchanges are illogical, etc.) is considered to be cheati
ng. -- 67 S 31 d.
5) You are not allowed to just give away the “unnecessary” players to other clubs (you are not allowed to make any gifts, etc.). If you want to get rid of a player, you have to fire him.
6) All exchanges with a club, that is bogus (a club that is about to be closed, a club that is made for “trash” storage, a club which exchanges are illogical, etc.) is considered to be cheati
ng. -- 67 S 31 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+6
As I'm reading this, I have to say everyone makes his case compelling :)
Still, it turns out, trading is a risky business: how in the world should I reckon if my trade partner is going to end bankrupt, or leave the game point blank like so many others did?
I'd rather say a preemptive NO, THANKS -- 67 S 31 d.
Still, it turns out, trading is a risky business: how in the world should I reckon if my trade partner is going to end bankrupt, or leave the game point blank like so many others did?
I'd rather say a preemptive NO, THANKS -- 67 S 31 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+2