Trade information
Accepted
Information | |
---|---|
Start of negotiation | 2016-12-31- 11:27 |
End of negotiation | 2016-12-31- 23:35 |
Restrictions' level |
|
Unknown Unknown | |||
Salary: | 34000 Eu | |||
Contract: | 1 S | Age: | 30 y. | |
RT: | 282 | Height: | 206 cm. | |
Potential: | 8 | |||
|
Unknown Unknown | |||
Salary: | 18426 Eu | |||
Contract: | 1 S | Age: | 26 y. | |
RT: | 270 | Height: | 209 cm. | |
Potential: | 9 |
|
Julio Ertham | |||
Salary: | 34011 Eu | |||
Contract: | 4 S | Age: | 29 y. | |
RT: | 326 | Height: | 208 cm. | |
Potential: | 10 | |||
|
Connor Markeley | |||
Salary: | 3577 Eu | |||
Contract: | 1 S | Age: | 22 y. | |
RT: | 196 | Height: | 211 cm. | |
Potential: | 7 |
+1
Show hidden replies: 14
superdzonis,that man is not going to save any money,in the end of the season he is going to spend more then before the trades,so,yes,you are lying.
--
56 S
14 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
No, I am not, you are. If you can see the trade was 2 for 2, not 1 for 2 and Markeley was playing in his team nearly from the beginning of the season. He saves money and expands his rotation, what was the main point of the trades, as he has loads of money as I see from his actions in market and max sum to spend for salaries.
--
56 S
14 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+1
Thus I totally agree that accepting this trade before Sunday's money transactions was not the smartest move, I would have waited a few hours to save those 15k. But at the same time, he has a very important game today, so that is reasonable as well.
--
56 S
14 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+1