Trade information
Accepted
Information | |
---|---|
Start of negotiation | 2025-01-27- 00:00 |
End of negotiation | 2025-01-27- 00:33 |
Restrictions' level |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
Salary: | 35802 Eu | |||
Contract: | 3 S | Age: | 27 y. | |
RT: | 395 | Height: | 199 cm. | |
Potential: | 1 |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
Salary: | 16062 Eu | |||
Contract: | 5 S | Age: | 26 y. | |
RT: | 280 | Height: | 203 cm. | |
Potential: | 4 |

+0
Show hidden replies: 3

Here we go again, like every beginning of the season, there are people who don't think the exchanges are good without seeing the whole thing. This change is motivated by the drop from WL2 to WL3 of one of the teams and which makes it impossible to keep a player who costs 36k in salary. This exchange has favored both teams, for him the lower salaries by obtaining a cheaper player in line with his new division and for me a player who allows me to suffer less to maintain myself. This exchange has triggered others to change players that I have left over and who have no place in the team and in the process to make way for a youth player.
--
103 S
1 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0


This trade was reported as unfair. However, the Fair play committee decided that this trade is fair.
--
103 S
3 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0


How the Fair Play Committee members voted:
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0
- volunteers voted "Revert": 0
- volunteers voted "Fair": 8
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:
-- 103 S 3 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0
- volunteers voted "Revert": 0
- volunteers voted "Fair": 8
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:
-- 103 S 3 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0