Trade information
Reverted
| Information | |
|---|---|
| Start of negotiation | 2021-07-04- 01:25 |
| End of negotiation | 2021-07-04- 04:27 |
| Restrictions' level | |
|
Fabian Böhmer | |||
| Salary: | 3130 Eu | |||
| Contract: | 1 S | Age: | 22 y. | |
| RT: | 132 | Height: | 207 cm. | |
| Potential: | 6 | |||
|
|
Isaiah Harcourt | |||
| Salary: | 3629 Eu | |||
| Contract: | 1 S | Age: | 18 y. | |
| RT: | 125 | Height: | 203 cm. | |
| Potential: | 7 | |||
|
|
Kevin Hao | |||
| Salary: | 9588 Eu | |||
| Contract: | 4 S | Age: | 17 y. | |
| RT: | 112 | Height: | 197 cm. | |
| Potential: | 9 | |||
Trade/Lending players:
+0
1.1
Show hidden replies: 4
Trade has been reverted by the "Fair play" committee
--
82 S
21 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
The Fair play committee decided that this trade is unfair and both teams were punished.
--
82 S
21 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 9<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
3 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
2 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- repeating same trade without making it more balanced is ignorance.<br />
--- The exchange is far from balanced. They are also repeat offenders in making unbalanced exchanges showing no intention of trying to make another more balanced one. For young potential 9 something better should be received. <br />
-- 82 S 21 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 9<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
3 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
2 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- repeating same trade without making it more balanced is ignorance.<br />
--- The exchange is far from balanced. They are also repeat offenders in making unbalanced exchanges showing no intention of trying to make another more balanced one. For young potential 9 something better should be received. <br />
-- 82 S 21 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
