Trade information

Accepted

Information
Start of negotiation 2020-11-06- 15:10
End of negotiation 2020-11-06- 18:04
Restrictions' level 7
Mozė Kliunka
Salary: 1950 Eu
Contract: 5 S Age: 22 y.
RT: 142 Height: 187 cm.
Potential: 7
Кrastev Arnaudov
Salary: 4000 Eu
Contract: 5 S Age: 21 y.
RT: 134 Height: 204 cm.
Potential: 7
Vygandas Narmontas
Salary: 1200 Eu
Contract: 4 S Age: 19 y.
RT: 89 Height: 205 cm.
Potential: 6
Xing Guāng
Salary: 6734 Eu
Contract: 3 S Age: 25 y.
RT: 187 Height: 183 cm.
Potential: 7
Icon Trade/Lending players: Staniunai & Amber Jack
-- 78 S 33 d.
Team made a trade offer
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Show hidden replies: 5
This trade was reported as unfair. I don't know why it happened because I need to strengthen my team and offered for another team fair trade: 3 of my younger players for his one older but more skillful player. All 3 players are young ant potential to become good players. I had too many players and another team had a bit less.
These were my reasons I have offered this trade for another team.
Best regards,
OnePlus5
-- 78 S 35 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
This trade was reported as unfair. However, the Fair play committee decided that this trade is fair. -- 78 S 35 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert and punish&quot;: 0<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert&quot;: 2<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Fair&quot;: 8<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players&#39; trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- <br />
-- 78 S 35 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0