Trade information
Accepted
Information | |
---|---|
Start of negotiation | 2020-11-06- 15:10 |
End of negotiation | 2020-11-06- 18:04 |
Restrictions' level |
|
Mozė Kliunka | |||
Salary: | 1950 Eu | |||
Contract: | 5 S | Age: | 22 y. | |
RT: | 142 | Height: | 187 cm. | |
Potential: | 7 | |||
|
Кrastev Arnaudov | |||
Salary: | 4000 Eu | |||
Contract: | 5 S | Age: | 21 y. | |
RT: | 134 | Height: | 204 cm. | |
Potential: | 7 | |||
|
Vygandas Narmontas | |||
Salary: | 1200 Eu | |||
Contract: | 4 S | Age: | 19 y. | |
RT: | 89 | Height: | 205 cm. | |
Potential: | 6 |
|
Xing Guāng | |||
Salary: | 6734 Eu | |||
Contract: | 3 S | Age: | 25 y. | |
RT: | 187 | Height: | 183 cm. | |
Potential: | 7 |
+0
Show hidden replies: 5
This trade was reported as unfair. I don't know why it happened because I need to strengthen my team and offered for another team fair trade: 3 of my younger players for his one older but more skillful player. All 3 players are young ant potential to become good players. I had too many players and another team had a bit less.
These were my reasons I have offered this trade for another team.
Best regards,
OnePlus5 -- 78 S 35 d.
These were my reasons I have offered this trade for another team.
Best regards,
OnePlus5 -- 78 S 35 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
This trade was reported as unfair. However, the Fair play committee decided that this trade is fair.
--
78 S
35 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 8<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- <br />
-- 78 S 35 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 8<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- <br />
-- 78 S 35 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0