Trade information
Accepted
| Information | |
|---|---|
| Start of negotiation | 2020-10-07- 21:31 |
| End of negotiation | 2020-10-07- 21:35 |
| Restrictions' level | |
|
Hā Zong | |||
| Salary: | 9870 Eu | |||
| Contract: | 4 S | Age: | 19 y. | |
| RT: | 120 | Height: | 213 cm. | |
| Potential: | 7 | |||
|
|
Asier Palencia | |||
| Salary: | 7379 Eu | |||
| Contract: | 3 S | Age: | 21 y. | |
| RT: | 155 | Height: | 209 cm. | |
| Potential: | 8 | |||
|
|
Pálmi Smárason | |||
| Salary: | - | |||
| Contract: | School talent | Age: | 17 y. | |
| RT: | 85 | Height: | 174 cm. | |
| Potential: | 8 | |||
2.2
Trade/Lending players:
+0
Show hidden replies: 4
We did it more than 10 days ago, I am confused what is the reason why someone can report this as unfair, I was looking to improve the position of C, I receive a player more in line with the age of my youth players and trained from a younger age, That's why I offer two players of higher potential for him.
--
78 S
16 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
This trade was reported as unfair. However, the Fair play committee decided that this trade is fair.
--
78 S
16 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 3<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 8<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
-- 78 S 16 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 3<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 8<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
-- 78 S 16 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
