Press conference

Icon Trade/Lending players: Answer & Cai Zara
-- 103 S 2 d.
Team made a trade offer
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Player: E Long
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 103 S 2 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Player: Jacobo Galaz
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 103 S 2 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Trade offer accepted -- 103 S 2 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
This trade was reported as unfair. However, the Fair play committee decided that this trade is fair. -- 103 S 3 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0
- volunteers voted "Revert": 1
- volunteers voted "Fair": 4

These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:
1 - Salary drop (one or more useful players are exchanged for useless player(s) with the only goal to reduce salaries)

 -- 103 S 3 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
??? -- 103 S 3 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Very confused why there is even 1 vote to revert.. nothing wrong with this trade at all. Glad the committee agrees. Keep up the good work <3 -- 103 S 4 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+6
I dont understand why this is fair, because Answer here gets a useless player for his team. 7 potential players do not reach to play in wl1 and are used only for moving players around between teams from China -- 103 S 4 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+4
You don't need to understand. If it's allowed to exchange 7pot for anything, then use it instead of asking pointless questions. -- 103 S 5 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+4