Press conference

Icon Trade/Lending players: Zen+Cal & Last Place
-- 98 S 3 d.
Team made a trade offer
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Player: Feihong Pou
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 98 S 3 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Player:
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 98 S 3 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Trade offer accepted -- 98 S 3 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
So... Pou has higher salary, inners for low post scorer but expecially 4 (FOUR!) experience at 24yo. The Polish player has below-market salary for 4 years and very good skills for 3/4 WL.

Also, I think i wrote PMs to more than half BasketPulse managers, which probably hate me rn, about trading Pou and everybody told me that 4 experience is too low to consider trading. I can provide screenshoot, i think it is a bigger sample to consider this a fair market value -- 98 S 3 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Other manager got experienced player with necessary skills and lower salary. I received older than average prospect who can provide at wl4 even with low experience and raised my teams salary cap. Before trade we exchanged in DMs with both players skills. -- 98 S 3 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
Trade has been reverted by the "Fair play" committee -- 98 S 4 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
The Fair play committee decided that the trade is unfair and teams are given a warning. -- 98 S 4 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert and punish&quot;: 0<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert&quot;: 6<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Fair&quot;: 5<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
6 - Suspicion that trade&rsquo;s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
 -- 98 S 4 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0