Press conference
Trade/Lending players:
Team made a trade offer
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
81 S
30 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
81 S
30 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
81 S
30 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Trade offer accepted
--
81 S
30 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
I proposed the trade looking for a solution to deficiencies in my team, lack of a backup point guard and more physicality and defence on the perimeter. The player Vaicekonis is a quality offensive player for WL5 and there are his stats over the past seasons. He is also a player who has already made the leap in quality and is possibly in his prime POT 4 RT 182.
The players I receive have higher POT but come from a lower division and not brilliant stats but well trained and with a view to the next two seasons can contribute a lot to my goal of promotion to WL4. -- 81 S 30 d.
The players I receive have higher POT but come from a lower division and not brilliant stats but well trained and with a view to the next two seasons can contribute a lot to my goal of promotion to WL4. -- 81 S 30 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+2
And although it's not my problem but I think Vaicekonis in WL6 can be a difference maker and help the other team with whom he trades. Therefore I consider it beneficial for both
--
81 S
30 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+2
This trade was reported as unfair. However, the Fair play committee decided that this trade is fair.
--
81 S
31 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 7<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
<br />
-- 81 S 31 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 7<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
<br />
-- 81 S 31 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0