Press conference
Trade/Lending players:
Team made a trade offer
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
76 S
1 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
76 S
1 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
76 S
1 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
76 S
1 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Trade offer accepted
--
76 S
1 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
This trade was reported as unfair. However, the Fair play committee decided that this trade is fair.
--
76 S
2 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 3<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 7<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Significantly unbalanced trade,<br />
--- <br />
-- 76 S 2 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 3<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 7<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Significantly unbalanced trade,<br />
--- <br />
-- 76 S 2 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0