記者會
交易/租借球員:
球隊提出交易請求
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
76 賽季
1 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
76 賽季
1 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
76 賽季
1 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
76 賽季
1 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易已接受
--
76 賽季
1 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
這筆交易被檢舉為不公平交易，但是公平競爭委員會決定這筆交易是公平的。
--
76 賽季
2 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 3<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 7<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Significantly unbalanced trade,<br />
--- <br />
-- 76 賽季 2 天
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 3<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 7<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Significantly unbalanced trade,<br />
--- <br />
-- 76 賽季 2 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0