Player information
This page contains information about the virtual game's character. Any coincidences with the real people (name, surname or other information) are accidental and unintended.
x1
x4
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x3
x2
x1
Nerimantas Načiūnas
- Shape:
- Excellent preparation
- Age:
- 29 y.
- Height:
- 202 cm. (6' 8'' )
- Position:
- SF (SG)
- Strength rate (RT):
- 349
- Predicted peak RT:
- 350
- Potential:
- 3
- First team:
- Utenos green death
Skills
Health
Athletic skill:
Accuracy:
Defence:
Offence:
Contract information
| Term | 4 S |
| Salary | 28 048 Eu |
| Opinion | Neutral |
Market information
| Minimum requested salary | 28 736 Eu |
1.1
Trade/Lending players:
+0
1.1
Show hidden replies: 7
Of course that everybody can explain his point of view, but I still cannot understand why this trade has been considered fair. Not for salaries (28k vs 0), not for actual or future player values. I just want to clarify my point of view for future trades: a similar trade can allow every user to justify their own because it's clearly and totally unbalanced and, for members of FPC, I think you should better explain to every user the reasons of this decision because it seems to me (and other users) that rules are weak for someone and hard for others
--
105 S
10 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+1
If you review the history of reported trades, you'll notice that sometimes a 10 POT player with a 360 RT potential is traded for someone with a 260 RT potential, and the FPC still deems the trade fair. This is because various factors influence a player's actual value - some players are poorly trained and don't reflect their full 10 POT potential, while others, despite being well-trained, may become less effective due to changes in the game engine.
Scouting timing also matters: for example, a 7 POT player drafted at age 14 will almost always outperform a 10 POT player drafted at 20+ years old by the time they reach their peak. These kinds of nuances are crucial to understanding trade fairness.
That’s why collaboration with the FPC is both necessary and beneficial. Without additional context or information, we can only evaluate the facts available to us at the time.
During this week new FPC report for season 104 should appear. Some clarities might come here as well. -- 105 S 10 d.
Scouting timing also matters: for example, a 7 POT player drafted at age 14 will almost always outperform a 10 POT player drafted at 20+ years old by the time they reach their peak. These kinds of nuances are crucial to understanding trade fairness.
That’s why collaboration with the FPC is both necessary and beneficial. Without additional context or information, we can only evaluate the facts available to us at the time.
During this week new FPC report for season 104 should appear. Some clarities might come here as well. -- 105 S 10 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Player:
+0
+0
Player:
+0
+0
- Shape: Not prepared
- Shape: Almost not prepared
- Shape: Excellent
- Shape: Tired
- Shape: Exhausted
- Not registrable for match
- Franchise player
- Team captain
- School talent
- Player has ended his career
- Club wants to trade this player
- Club doesn't want to trade this player
- Transferring player is currently not allowed
- Player is on loan (contract with another club)
- Is going to end his career in the end of the season
- Good dunker
- Good defender
- Good 3-point shooter
- Good playmaker
- Gold medal
- Silver medal
- Bronze medal
- MVP of the season
- In season's TOP5
- The most perspective in league
- Participant of the All Star day