How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 9<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
3 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
2 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Salary drop (one or more useful players are exchanged for useless player(s) with the only goal to reduce salaries)<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- One-sided trade when a 15y/o 10pot school talent is traded for lower ceiling and potential players.<br />
--
75 賽季
1 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
1.1
交易/租借球員: 
1.1
1.1
