記者會
交易/租借球員:
球隊提出交易請求
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
90 賽季
2 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
90 賽季
2 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
90 賽季
2 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
90 賽季
2 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
1.1
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 3<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Trade constitutes a "hidden lending" (player(s) that changed team went back to the original team)<br />
1 - Suspicion of a trade with fake team or inactive user<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
-- 90 賽季 7 天
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 3<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Trade constitutes a "hidden lending" (player(s) that changed team went back to the original team)<br />
1 - Suspicion of a trade with fake team or inactive user<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
-- 90 賽季 7 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
Which one is fake team? Which one helps which team? Already one more season, where is the lending?
Some FPC members are losing mind.
This is crazy. If it continues I will start reporting all trades that are not perfectly balanced. Crazy. -- 90 賽季 7 天
Some FPC members are losing mind.
This is crazy. If it continues I will start reporting all trades that are not perfectly balanced. Crazy. -- 90 賽季 7 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
Fair trade. 257RT +POT 7 = POT 8
That POT 7 is a 3pt shooter that I do not like the low strength. Simple and fair. Please vote fair. Thanks. -- 90 賽季 7 天
That POT 7 is a 3pt shooter that I do not like the low strength. Simple and fair. Please vote fair. Thanks. -- 90 賽季 7 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
Please put in evidence if you accuse any of us of a fake team.
--
90 賽季
8 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
I have played this game over an year. It’s made me tired keep writing explanation on reported trade.
I think FPC should themselves come to a conclusion on what is “hidden lending”. I have sent private messages to FPC members last season asking for their opinion about hidden lending and only a few replied me.
They gave opinions on this issue and said they think it is acceptable to trade the same player back to the original team in the next season. I try my best to follow those unwritten rules and you told me I should be punished?
It would be the best for FPC to write down the criteria of “hidden lending” or other rules that will be considered as unfair, so that there is no need for us to guess the mood of FPC in every single trade. -- 90 賽季 8 天
I think FPC should themselves come to a conclusion on what is “hidden lending”. I have sent private messages to FPC members last season asking for their opinion about hidden lending and only a few replied me.
They gave opinions on this issue and said they think it is acceptable to trade the same player back to the original team in the next season. I try my best to follow those unwritten rules and you told me I should be punished?
It would be the best for FPC to write down the criteria of “hidden lending” or other rules that will be considered as unfair, so that there is no need for us to guess the mood of FPC in every single trade. -- 90 賽季 8 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+1
Help one of the teams. Help which one? Please specify with explanation. Seems fair, thank you.
--
90 賽季
8 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易已被公平競賽委員會退回
--
90 賽季
8 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
公平競賽委員會決定這筆交易不公平，並向球隊提出警告。
--
90 賽季
8 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 7<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 4<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
6 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
3 - Trade constitutes a "hidden lending" (player(s) that changed team went back to the original team)<br />
1 - Suspicion of a trade with fake team or inactive user<br />
<br />
-- 90 賽季 8 天
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 7<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 4<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
6 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
3 - Trade constitutes a "hidden lending" (player(s) that changed team went back to the original team)<br />
1 - Suspicion of a trade with fake team or inactive user<br />
<br />
-- 90 賽季 8 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0