記者會

Icon 交易/租借球員: ZaLGeRis & Los Pollos
-- 74 賽季 14 天
球隊提出交易請求
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
球員:
交易後開始在新球隊比賽 -- 74 賽季 14 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
球員: Donaldas Lasys
交易後開始在新球隊比賽 -- 74 賽季 14 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
球員: DuDu Huáng
交易後開始在新球隊比賽 -- 74 賽季 14 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
球員:
交易後開始在新球隊比賽 -- 74 賽季 14 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
交易已接受 -- 74 賽季 14 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
Komentaras: Reikia kaip imanoma sumazinti biudzeta nes gresia bankrotas ir gauti jaunu zaideju ateiciai. Daugiau PM -- 74 賽季 15 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
交易已被公平競賽委員會退回 -- 74 賽季 15 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
公平競賽委員會決定這筆交易不公平，並向球隊提出警告。 -- 74 賽季 15 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert and punish&quot;: 2<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert&quot;: 6<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Fair&quot;: 1<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade&rsquo;s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
5 - Trade constitutes a &quot;hidden lending&quot; (player(s) that changed team went back to the original team)<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Players can not be traded and traded back between teams in the same season<br />
--- Same players change same teams two times in one season. Its against the game rules.<br />
 -- 74 賽季 15 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
That is a funny statement - a hidden lending of 32 year olds? Haha. That doesn't make sense, I think this reason for reverting the trade should be reworded or have an additional explanation for FPC members. Pretty sure its original intent was not aimed at trades of veterans.

Furthermore, there is no rule saying that a player could not be traded back to the original team during the same season. It cannot be imposed if it was not communicated in advance. -- 74 賽季 15 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+4
That is a funny statement - a hidden lending of 32 year olds? Haha. That doesn't make sense, I think this reason for reverting the trade should be reworded or have an additional explanation for FPC members. Pretty sure its original intent was not aimed at trades of veterans.

Furthermore, there is no rule saying that a player could not be traded back to the original team during the same season. It cannot be imposed if it was not communicated in advance. -- 74 賽季 15 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+4
these rules are visible only to ftc members, simple users like me, does not see it :) -- 74 賽季 15 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+4
Will FPC give punishment to managers few days later? -- 74 賽季 15 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+1
O cia kazkodel neuzkliuvo. https://www.basketpulse.com/lt/Trade/information/978051 Motyvacija ta pati, kazkas taupo, kazkas stipreja, o sprendimas skirtingas. -- 74 賽季 15 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+3
https://www.basketpulse.com/lt/Trade/information/978051 va kaip toki praėjo labiau stebina. :Ddddddddd Dar tavo baika pagal šituos. :Dddddddddd -- 74 賽季 15 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+4
nebevartokit tikrai. -- 74 賽季 15 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+4
my personal opinion of these 2 trades is that LosPollos were desperate for help at Center, and traded for Huang believing he was an improvement over Lasys.
After a few games, it became clear Huang cannot play at WL1 level, and LosPollos tried to go back to the previous situation.
Kriaučius is a non factor: he was offered around since the day he was born, and nobody wants him :(
Silly, useless trades, but no harm's done in my view because all players involved are incosequential -- 74 賽季 15 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+4
Kipras_Justas mes vartosim kaip vartoje, o tu bent muila pasiimk nardydamas -- 74 賽季 15 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+12
kliuvertui dedam riebu pliusa -- 74 賽季 15 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+6