球員資訊
This page contains information about the virtual game's character. Any coincidences with the real people (name, surname or other information) are accidental and unintended.
x1
x1
x3
x1
Oliver Chojnacki
- 狀態:
- 充份準備
- 年齡:
- 25 歲
- 身高:
- 204 公分 (6' 8'' )
- 位置:
- SF (SF)
- 能力值 (RT):
- 279
- 預估巔峰RT:
- 316
- 潛力:
- 6
- 第一支球隊:
- IŠEINU ATOSTOGŲ
技能
健康
運動技能:
投籃:
防守:
進攻:
合約資訊
| 期限 | 4 賽季 |
| 薪資 | 11 326 Eu |
| 意見 | 良好 |
市場資訊
| 最低薪資要求 | 16 581 Eu |
1.1
交易/租借球員:
+0
2.1
球員:
+0
1.1
+0
顯示隱藏回應: 6
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0
- volunteers voted "Revert": 0
- volunteers voted "Fair": 9
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:
-- 102 賽季 25 天
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0
- volunteers voted "Revert": 0
- volunteers voted "Fair": 9
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:
-- 102 賽季 25 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
1.1
Salary drop. Trade is not useful. Such potential youth will never play in wl1
--
103 賽季
3 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+2
With all due respect, who are You to judge whether or not these youngsters will ever be eligable for WL1 level? Do You know information about their skills or inners?:)
On top of this, my lithuanian colleague has short-sighted vision, as he believes that either youngsters acquired should be solely for WL1 future usage or they are automatically "useless". What happens, if one gathers a few 7-8 pots, which are later on turned into 9 pot?
I understand that someone is trying to point fingers left n right, without really digging into details (although "7-8 hours were spent" on this analysis), but such claims automatically drag down the quality of other research materials, which actually DO identify scatchy trade mechanics between some teams. I can assure anyone that is looking on this specific example - both of the acquired ASSETS will have positive contribution to my teams long-term prospects.
And so that anyone does not go crazy - as of this specific moment, I am looking to move 2 defense-specialists, and for either of them multiple 7pots or 1 8pot would be reasonable return. Irrespective of the fact that there is no 8pot with predicted RT of 430, nowhere near to the top guy that I am looking to move.:)
Hope it makes sense,
Cheers -- 103 賽季 3 天
On top of this, my lithuanian colleague has short-sighted vision, as he believes that either youngsters acquired should be solely for WL1 future usage or they are automatically "useless". What happens, if one gathers a few 7-8 pots, which are later on turned into 9 pot?
I understand that someone is trying to point fingers left n right, without really digging into details (although "7-8 hours were spent" on this analysis), but such claims automatically drag down the quality of other research materials, which actually DO identify scatchy trade mechanics between some teams. I can assure anyone that is looking on this specific example - both of the acquired ASSETS will have positive contribution to my teams long-term prospects.
And so that anyone does not go crazy - as of this specific moment, I am looking to move 2 defense-specialists, and for either of them multiple 7pots or 1 8pot would be reasonable return. Irrespective of the fact that there is no 8pot with predicted RT of 430, nowhere near to the top guy that I am looking to move.:)
Hope it makes sense,
Cheers -- 103 賽季 3 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+8
1.1
+0
球員:
+0
- 狀態：毫無準備
- 狀態：稍有準備
- 狀態：充份準備
- 狀態：有點疲憊
- 狀態：筋疲力盡
- 未註冊上場
- 核心球員
- 球隊隊長
- 學校潛力球員
- 球員已結束生涯
- 俱樂部想交易該球員
- 俱樂部不想交易該球員
- 目前無法移動
- 球員租借中
- 將在本賽季末結束生涯
- 灌籃高手
- 防守悍將
- 三分神射
- 組織達人
- 金牌
- 銀牌
- 銅牌
- 賽季MVP
- 賽季最佳五人
- 聯賽最具未來性球員
- 全明星日參與者