球員資訊

資訊

This page contains information about the virtual game's character. Any coincidences with the real people (name, surname or other information) are accidental and unintended.

x1
x4
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x1
x3
x2
x1

flag Nerimantas Načiūnas

Nerimantas Načiūnas 頭像
team-jerseys-front team-jerseys-front
充份準備 該俱樂部不想交易這名球員
狀態:
充份準備
年齡:
29 歲
身高:
202 公分 (6' 8'' )
位置:
SF (SG)
能力值 (RT):
349
預估巔峰RT:
350
潛力:
3
第一支球隊:
Utenos green death
隊徽
team-jerseys-front

技能

健康
100%
100%
運動技能:
11
11
投籃:
6
6
防守:
8
8
進攻:
9
9

合約資訊

期限 4 賽季
薪資 28 048 Eu
意見 中性

市場資訊

最低薪資要求 28 736 Eu
Icon 交易/租借球員: Utenos gre & Armadillos
-- 105 賽季 8 天
球隊提出交易請求
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
顯示隱藏回應: 7
Of course that everybody can explain his point of view, but I still cannot understand why this trade has been considered fair. Not for salaries (28k vs 0), not for actual or future player values. I just want to clarify my point of view for future trades: a similar trade can allow every user to justify their own because it's clearly and totally unbalanced and, for members of FPC, I think you should better explain to every user the reasons of this decision because it seems to me (and other users) that rules are weak for someone and hard for others -- 105 賽季 10 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+1
If you review the history of reported trades, you'll notice that sometimes a 10 POT player with a 360 RT potential is traded for someone with a 260 RT potential, and the FPC still deems the trade fair. This is because various factors influence a player's actual value - some players are poorly trained and don't reflect their full 10 POT potential, while others, despite being well-trained, may become less effective due to changes in the game engine.

Scouting timing also matters: for example, a 7 POT player drafted at age 14 will almost always outperform a 10 POT player drafted at 20+ years old by the time they reach their peak. These kinds of nuances are crucial to understanding trade fairness.

That’s why collaboration with the FPC is both necessary and beneficial. Without additional context or information, we can only evaluate the facts available to us at the time.

During this week new FPC report for season 104 should appear. Some clarities might come here as well.
-- 105 賽季 10 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
Ok, I understand your point, even if I don't agree I respect the decision. It would be a good idea if you take this trade as axample of a fair trade, just to let people know where are the fair trade limits. Thanks -- 105 賽季 10 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+4
Icon 球員: Nerimantas Načiūnas (RT: 349)
-- 105 賽季 1 天
球員從青年隊移動到主隊
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
Icon 球員: Nerimantas Načiūnas (RT: 349)
-- 104 賽季 11 天
球員移動到青年隊
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
Icon 球員: Nerimantas Načiūnas (RT: 349)
-- 103 賽季 63 天
與球員續約
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
Icon 球員: Nerimantas Načiūnas (RT: 349)
-- 103 賽季 59 天
球員接受俱樂部提供的合約
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0