Takas bilgisi

Kabul edildi

Bilgi
Müzakere başlangıcı 2025-06-05- 19:57
Müzakere sonu 2025-06-06- 15:53
Restrictions' level 7
flag Valentim Garcia
Maaş: 16632 Eu
Sözleşme: 1 S Yaş: 30 y.
GS: 286 Boy: 207 cm.
Potansiyel: 3
flag João Pinho
Maaş: -
Sözleşme: School talent Yaş: 17 y.
GS: 100 Boy: 201 cm.
Potansiyel: 6
flag Yung-Jen Guan
Maaş: 21000 Eu
Sözleşme: 4 S Yaş: 27 y.
GS: 298 Boy: 211 cm.
Potansiyel: 9
Icon Takas/Kiralık oyuncular: Maia BC & Toronto
-- 105 S 4 g.
Team made a trade offer
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+0
Gizli cevapları göster: 4
I don't understand why someone would vote against this trade. The reasoning behind it seems pretty clear.
The coach of Toronto put Yung-Jen on the trade available, and since he's in WL3, i assume it's for financial reasons, the player is clearly good enough to make an impact in that league.
My team is currently in WL2 and now has the financial flexibility to accommodate higher salaries, so I made an offer: a solid WL3-level player in the final year of his contract with a lower salary (which helps the other team rebuild quickly), plus a player with 6 potential and a decent predicted RT. That so i get a very good player to help me in my WL2 journey and with some potential to be better.

To me, it's a fair deal and beneficial for both sides.
-- 105 S 7 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+1
This trade was reported as unfair. However, the Fair play committee decided that this trade is fair. -- 105 S 7 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0
- volunteers voted "Revert": 0
- volunteers voted "Fair": 7

These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:

-- 105 S 7 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+0