Takas bilgisi
Kabul edildi
Bilgi | |
---|---|
Müzakere başlangıcı | 2025-06-05- 19:57 |
Müzakere sonu | 2025-06-06- 15:53 |
Restrictions' level |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
Maaş: | 16632 Eu | |||
Sözleşme: | 1 S | Yaş: | 30 y. | |
GS: | 286 | Boy: | 207 cm. | |
Potansiyel: | 3 | |||
![]() |
![]() |
|||
Maaş: | - | |||
Sözleşme: | School talent | Yaş: | 17 y. | |
GS: | 100 | Boy: | 201 cm. | |
Potansiyel: | 6 |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
Maaş: | 21000 Eu | |||
Sözleşme: | 4 S | Yaş: | 27 y. | |
GS: | 298 | Boy: | 211 cm. | |
Potansiyel: | 9 |

+0
Gizli cevapları göster: 4

I don't understand why someone would vote against this trade. The reasoning behind it seems pretty clear.
The coach of Toronto put Yung-Jen on the trade available, and since he's in WL3, i assume it's for financial reasons, the player is clearly good enough to make an impact in that league.
My team is currently in WL2 and now has the financial flexibility to accommodate higher salaries, so I made an offer: a solid WL3-level player in the final year of his contract with a lower salary (which helps the other team rebuild quickly), plus a player with 6 potential and a decent predicted RT. That so i get a very good player to help me in my WL2 journey and with some potential to be better.
To me, it's a fair deal and beneficial for both sides. -- 105 S 7 g.
The coach of Toronto put Yung-Jen on the trade available, and since he's in WL3, i assume it's for financial reasons, the player is clearly good enough to make an impact in that league.
My team is currently in WL2 and now has the financial flexibility to accommodate higher salaries, so I made an offer: a solid WL3-level player in the final year of his contract with a lower salary (which helps the other team rebuild quickly), plus a player with 6 potential and a decent predicted RT. That so i get a very good player to help me in my WL2 journey and with some potential to be better.
To me, it's a fair deal and beneficial for both sides. -- 105 S 7 g.
--
(tercüme et)
(tercüme et EN)
+1


This trade was reported as unfair. However, the Fair play committee decided that this trade is fair.
--
105 S
7 g.
--
(tercüme et)
(tercüme et EN)
+0


How the Fair Play Committee members voted:
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0
- volunteers voted "Revert": 0
- volunteers voted "Fair": 7
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:
-- 105 S 7 g.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0
- volunteers voted "Revert": 0
- volunteers voted "Fair": 7
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:
-- 105 S 7 g.
--
(tercüme et)
(tercüme et EN)
+0