Takas bilgisi

Geri alındı

Bilgi
Müzakere başlangıcı	2023-01-19- 09:38
Müzakere sonu	2023-01-21- 14:54
Restrictions' level	10

Tian Shen Alliance

	Nuan Ma
	Maaş:	25167 Eu
	Sözleşme:	5 S	Yaş:	29 y.
	GS:	324	Boy:	204 cm.
	Potansiyel:	9
	Vaidutis Kairys
	Maaş:	10850 Eu
	Sözleşme:	5 S	Yaş:	19 y.
	GS:	170	Boy:	200 cm.
	Potansiyel:	10

volvos60

	Kazys Galunas
	Maaş:	35078 Eu
	Sözleşme:	2 S	Yaş:	35 y.
	GS:	372	Boy:	214 cm.
	Potansiyel:	9
	Shuo God
	Maaş:	3614 Eu
	Sözleşme:	3 S	Yaş:	18 y.
	GS:	131	Boy:	210 cm.
	Potansiyel:	8

1.1 1.1 Tian Shen

Takas/Kiralık oyuncular: Tian Shen & volvo

-- 91 S 18 g.

Team made a trade offer

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

+0

Oyuncu: Nuan Ma

Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 91 S 20 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

+0

Oyuncu: Vaidutis Kairys

Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 91 S 20 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

+0

Oyuncu:

Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 91 S 20 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

+0

Oyuncu: Shuo God

Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 91 S 20 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

+0

Takas teklifi kabul edildi -- 91 S 20 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

+0

1.1 1.1 WelkinLiu

Dear FPC judges, someone has reported this transaction, and I will make an explanation: First, I think both transactions are fair in terms of salary and ability; Secondly, it is not the act of renting. Let me explain that last week I wanted to give up this season's schedule, so I used K.G to trade young players. But in several games this week, I found that I still have a good ability to continue to work hard, so I used better players to trade back to K.G. Some people may think that the two players traded twice, but I paid different chips before and after, and I also paid a higher price to make up for the mistakes I made last week. So I think there is no problem with this transaction, thank the judges. -- 91 S 20 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

+2

1.1 1.1 WelkinLiu

Dear FPC judges, someone has reported this trade, and I will make an explanation: First, I think both trades are fair in terms of salary and skills; Second, it is not a hidden lending. Let me explain that last week I wanted to give up this season, so I used K.G to trade young players. But after several games until this week, I found that I still have a good chance to fight, so I used better players to trade back to K.G. Some people may think that the two players traded twice, but I paid different chips before and after, and I also paid a higher price to make up for the mistakes I made last week. So I think this is a fair trade, thank the judges. -- 91 S 20 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

+1

Gizli cevapları göster: 7

Fair play committee

Takas döndürüldü -- 91 S 21 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

+0

Fair play committee

The Fair play committee decided that the trade is unfair and teams are given a warning. -- 91 S 21 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

+0

Fair play committee

How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 12<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 2<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
10 - Trade constitutes a "hidden lending" (player(s) that changed team went back to the original team)<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Hide lending. Not allowed this type of tfades.<br />
--- <br />
-- 91 S 21 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

+0