Takas bilgisi

Geri alındı

Bilgi
Müzakere başlangıcı	2022-11-27- 09:51
Müzakere sonu	2022-11-27- 14:01
Restrictions' level	10

volvos60

	Jiapeng Kan
	Maaş:	-
	Sözleşme:	School talent	Yaş:	15 y.
	GS:	62	Boy:	180 cm.
	Potansiyel:	7

Basketball Emperor Chamberlain

	Kariška Kumštys
	Maaş:	31222 Eu
	Sözleşme:	1 S	Yaş:	31 y.
	GS:	336	Boy:	199 cm.
	Potansiyel:	8

Takas/Kiralık oyuncular: volvo & Big Dipper

-- 90 S 28 g.

Team made a trade offer

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

+0

Oyuncu: Jiapeng Kan

Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 90 S 28 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

+0

Oyuncu:

Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 90 S 28 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

+0

1.1 1.1 Big Dipper

Takas teklifi kabul edildi -- 90 S 28 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

+0

Is this salary drop? -- 90 S 28 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

+0

1.1 2.2 fungtys

Don't think it is a salary drop.
Salary drop: "Exchanged for useless player(s) with the ONLY goal to reduce salaries"
POT 7 school has great trade value so it is a trade not a drop. -- 90 S 28 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

+1

And this POT 7 will never reach wl1 level... -- 90 S 28 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

+1

1.1 1.1 david1992

Agree with Fung. The goal here is I can save and get a player I can develop for the future (7-pot is good value in the NE which encourages 12-man lineups), and the other team gets a one-season veteran that will help him fight for promotion. It is very common in the NBA, where contenders can use their trade exceptions (trade level 10) to give future draft picks (school talents) for a veteran to help them fight for championships. And this is more common in our game during this season too, a lot of teams from different federations have done similar trades, should all of them be reported and reverted? I don’t think so because it means a lot of managers in our community think this kind of trade is fair, so I hope the FPC can realize it and keep the same standards to all trade. Thanks. -- 90 S 28 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

+1

1.1 1.1 david1992

A lot of 7-pot players have played in WL1 and I personally have a few of them, so how did you come up with the conclusion to say they will NEVER reach WL1 level? Look at the TOP 16 teams in WL1, a lot of teams have player with RT under 300 and they are playing fine for their teams. The NE encourage more players, and most teams cannot afford to have a 12-man lineup with 12 high RT players, then 7-pot players can play a key role for the team too. -- 90 S 28 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

+2

Fair play committee

Takas döndürüldü -- 90 S 28 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

+0

Fair play committee

The Fair play committee decided that the trade is unfair and teams are given a warning. -- 90 S 28 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

+0

Gizli cevapları göster: 10

Fair play committee

How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 12<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
10 - Salary drop (one or more useful players are exchanged for useless player(s) with the only goal to reduce salaries)<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Salary drop……………..,,,,,, ……. Zxxxx<br />
-- 90 S 28 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

+0

1.1 2.2 fungtys

This "revert and punish" vote is too irrational. It is crazy and ought to be the true one to be punished. -- 90 S 30 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

+0

1.1 2.2 fungtys

Therefore, FPC is now banning WL 1 managers to acquire any POT 7 school boys, simply because FPC strongly believe WL 1 managers do not know how to train school boys. Right? -- 90 S 30 g.

-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)

+0