Basın toplantısı

Icon Takas/Kiralık oyuncular: Almorranas & Smerfs
-- 92 S 21 g.
Team made a trade offer
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 92 S 21 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+0
Oyuncu: Man Hong Ha
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 92 S 21 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+0
Oyuncu: Yao-Hsun Wen
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 92 S 21 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+0
Oyuncu: Sung-Fu Zhuang
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 92 S 21 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+0
Oyuncu:
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 92 S 21 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+0
Takas teklifi kabul edildi -- 92 S 21 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+0
Takas döndürüldü -- 92 S 22 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+0
The Fair play committee decided that the trade is unfair and teams are given a warning. -- 92 S 22 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert and punish&quot;: 1<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert&quot;: 6<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Fair&quot;: 7<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
3 - Suspicion that trade&rsquo;s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Wrong information provided to the trade partner<br />
<br />
3 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Trade should be reverted because it's 4 player gifting for nothing. FPC should not be used for reverting mistakes<br />
--- Player forgot to include a player in the trade<br />
--- Both teams owners asked to revert trade due to mistake at creating trade offer<br />
 -- 92 S 22 g.
-- (tercüme et) (tercüme et EN)
+0