Basın toplantısı
Takas/Kiralık oyuncular:
Team made a trade offer
--
(tercüme et)
(tercüme et EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
67 S
3 g.
--
(tercüme et)
(tercüme et EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
67 S
3 g.
--
(tercüme et)
(tercüme et EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
67 S
3 g.
--
(tercüme et)
(tercüme et EN)
+0
Takas teklifi kabul edildi
--
67 S
3 g.
--
(tercüme et)
(tercüme et EN)
+0
Takas döndürüldü
--
67 S
4 g.
--
(tercüme et)
(tercüme et EN)
+0
I want to know why this transaction was withdrawn, so that I can avoid the same mistake again. Fair play can tell me why?
--
67 S
22 g.
--
(tercüme et)
(tercüme et EN)
+0
My team has reduced expenses, got better finances, and the other team has got some better players, which is good for both sides, isn't it?
--
67 S
22 g.
--
(tercüme et)
(tercüme et EN)
+1
Salary dumping is not a strategy that will be allowed by the FTC in fact new restrictions prevent it. Allowing trades just for the sake of reducing salaries would open the door to too many opportunities of cheating or making favorable deals once top 16 slash bottom 16. Zhuce try looking at the bigger picture and think what could happen to the game if salary dump trades were allowed. It really could cause chaos and no way anyone could manage that potential chaos.
--
67 S
22 g.
--
(tercüme et)
(tercüme et EN)
+0