Конференција за штампа
1.1
Тргување/размена/Играчи ставени за позајмица:
Тимот на клубот даде понуда за тргување/размена
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+0
Почна да игра во нов тим по тргувањето/размената
--
91 С
20 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+0
Почна да игра во нов тим по тргувањето/размената
--
91 С
20 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+0
Почна да игра во нов тим по тргувањето/размената
--
91 С
20 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+0
Почна да игра во нов тим по тргувањето/размената
--
91 С
20 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+0
Dear FPC judges, someone has reported this transaction, and I will make an explanation: First, I think both transactions are fair in terms of salary and ability; Secondly, it is not the act of renting. Let me explain that last week I wanted to give up this season's schedule, so I used K.G to trade young players. But in several games this week, I found that I still have a good ability to continue to work hard, so I used better players to trade back to K.G. Some people may think that the two players traded twice, but I paid different chips before and after, and I also paid a higher price to make up for the mistakes I made last week. So I think there is no problem with this transaction, thank the judges.
--
91 С
20 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+2
Dear FPC judges, someone has reported this trade, and I will make an explanation: First, I think both trades are fair in terms of salary and skills; Second, it is not a hidden lending. Let me explain that last week I wanted to give up this season, so I used K.G to trade young players. But after several games until this week, I found that I still have a good chance to fight, so I used better players to trade back to K.G. Some people may think that the two players traded twice, but I paid different chips before and after, and I also paid a higher price to make up for the mistakes I made last week. So I think this is a fair trade, thank the judges.
--
91 С
20 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+1
Тргувањето/размената е поништено од "Фер плеј" комисијата.
--
91 С
21 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+0
Фер плеј комисијата одлучи дека тргувањето/замената е нефер и клубовите добиваат предупредување за следно прекршување казна.
--
91 С
21 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 12<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 2<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
10 - Trade constitutes a "hidden lending" (player(s) that changed team went back to the original team)<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Hide lending. Not allowed this type of tfades.<br />
--- <br />
-- 91 С 21 д
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 12<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 2<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
10 - Trade constitutes a "hidden lending" (player(s) that changed team went back to the original team)<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Hide lending. Not allowed this type of tfades.<br />
--- <br />
-- 91 С 21 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+0