Конференција за штампа
1.1
Тргување/размена/Играчи ставени за позајмица:
Тимот на клубот даде понуда за тргување/размена
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+0
Почна да игра во нов тим по тргувањето/размената
--
75 С
8 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+0
Почна да игра во нов тим по тргувањето/размената
--
75 С
8 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+0
Почна да игра во нов тим по тргувањето/размената
--
75 С
8 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+0
Почна да игра во нов тим по тргувањето/размената
--
75 С
8 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+0
2.1
Тргувањето/размената е поништено од "Фер плеј" комисијата.
--
75 С
9 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+0
Фер плеј комисијата одлучи дека тргувањето/замената е нефер и клубовите добиваат предупредување за следно прекршување казна.
--
75 С
9 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 3<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 5<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 2<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
4 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- <br />
-- 75 С 9 д
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 3<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 5<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 2<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
4 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- <br />
-- 75 С 9 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+0
Very strange decision.
One team get a player with high potential, the second - a man who can help here and now (two other participants of trade are additional). Why is it disbalanced?
The next reason is strange and hasn't explanation.
Third reason: hàh, this argentinian player is not so strong and so cheap to say that teams from 5th division can't buy him as free agent.
Reason for me in thinking that trade was fair: both manager has expirience in game. At least one of them is from my native league and I can say that he never made anything breaking rules.
Conclusion: fair play committee should be more fair or more clear for the comunity and explane enigmatic reasons like "suspiction". -- 75 С 9 д
One team get a player with high potential, the second - a man who can help here and now (two other participants of trade are additional). Why is it disbalanced?
The next reason is strange and hasn't explanation.
Third reason: hàh, this argentinian player is not so strong and so cheap to say that teams from 5th division can't buy him as free agent.
Reason for me in thinking that trade was fair: both manager has expirience in game. At least one of them is from my native league and I can say that he never made anything breaking rules.
Conclusion: fair play committee should be more fair or more clear for the comunity and explane enigmatic reasons like "suspiction". -- 75 С 9 д
--
(Преведи)
(Преведи EN)
+2