Darījuma informācija
Atgriezts
| Informācija | |
|---|---|
| Pārrunu sākšana | 2023-03-26- 09:23 |
| Pārrunu beigšana | 2023-03-26- 09:28 |
| Ierobežojumu līmenis | |
|
Edvinas Arbačiauskas
|
|||
| Alga: | 4315 Eu | |||
| Līgums: | 2 S | Vecums: | 19 g. | |
| RT: | 159 | Garums: | 215 cm. | |
| Potenciāls: | 7 | |||
|
Man Hong Ha
|
|||
| Alga: | - | |||
| Līgums: | Skolas talants | Vecums: | 16 g. | |
| RT: | 91 | Garums: | 196 cm. | |
| Potenciāls: | 8 | |||
|
Yao-Hsun Wen
|
|||
| Alga: | - | |||
| Līgums: | Skolas talants | Vecums: | 16 g. | |
| RT: | 63 | Garums: | 193 cm. | |
| Potenciāls: | 7 | |||
|
Sung-Fu Zhuang
|
|||
| Alga: | - | |||
| Līgums: | Skolas talants | Vecums: | 14 g. | |
| RT: | 33 | Garums: | 184 cm. | |
| Potenciāls: | 7 | |||
|
Boonma Hathairattanakool | |||
| Alga: | 5316 Eu | |||
| Līgums: | 1 S | Vecums: | 27 g. | |
| RT: | 200 | Garums: | 199 cm. | |
| Potenciāls: | 6 | |||
1.1
Maiņa/Aizdotie spēlētāji:
+0
2.2
Parādīt paslēptās ziņas: 6
Maiņas darījumu atcēla Godīgas Spēles komiteja (FPC)
--
92 S
22 d.
--
(Tulkot)
(Tulkot EN)
+0
Godīgas Spēles komiteja (FPC) nolēma, ka šis darījums ir negodīgs un abas darījumā iesaistītās komandas saņēma brīdinājumus.
--
92 S
22 d.
--
(Tulkot)
(Tulkot EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 7<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
3 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Wrong information provided to the trade partner<br />
<br />
3 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Trade should be reverted because it's 4 player gifting for nothing. FPC should not be used for reverting mistakes<br />
--- Player forgot to include a player in the trade<br />
--- Both teams owners asked to revert trade due to mistake at creating trade offer<br />
-- 92 S 22 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 7<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
3 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Wrong information provided to the trade partner<br />
<br />
3 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Trade should be reverted because it's 4 player gifting for nothing. FPC should not be used for reverting mistakes<br />
--- Player forgot to include a player in the trade<br />
--- Both teams owners asked to revert trade due to mistake at creating trade offer<br />
-- 92 S 22 d.
--
(Tulkot)
(Tulkot EN)
+0
