Preses konference

Icon Maiņa/Aizdotie spēlētāji: Reapers & Louisville
-- 83 S 33 d.
Komanda izteica maiņas darījuma piedāvājumu
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
Spēlētājs:
Uzsāka spēlēt jaunajā komandā pēc maiņas darījuma -- 83 S 33 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
Spēlētājs:
Uzsāka spēlēt jaunajā komandā pēc maiņas darījuma -- 83 S 33 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
Spēlētājs:
Uzsāka spēlēt jaunajā komandā pēc maiņas darījuma -- 83 S 33 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
Maiņas darījums tika akceptēts -- 83 S 33 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
Šis darījums tika ziņots kā negodīgs. Tomēr, Godīgas Spēles komiteja (FPC) nolēma, ka šis darījums ir godīgs. -- 83 S 35 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert and punish&quot;: 0<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert&quot;: 3<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Fair&quot;: 6<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players&#39; trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade&rsquo;s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
 -- 83 S 35 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
I see it helps a lot to be on the committee. I ask for the removal of this unsuitable and biased committee and to return to a system of rules with more severe computer blocking than before since apparently there was abuse but where club managers would have the freedom to manage their team as they would like and would not be at the mercy of opposing players defending their own interests !!! -- 83 S 36 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+1