Csere információi
Elfogadva
Információk | |
---|---|
A tárgyalás kezdete | 2019-10-04- 16:23 |
A tárgyalás befejezése | 2019-10-04- 18:30 |
Korlátozási szint |
|
André Duchene | |||
Fizetés: | 7808 Eu | |||
Szerződés: | 2 Sz | Életkor: | 19 év | |
ERŐ: | 135 | Magasság: | 198 cm. | |
Tehetség: | 9 |
|
Thibaut Barbier | |||
Fizetés: | 4350 Eu | |||
Szerződés: | 5 Sz | Életkor: | 23 év | |
ERŐ: | 165 | Magasság: | 205 cm. | |
Tehetség: | 7 | |||
|
Brunonas Meškinis | |||
Fizetés: | 1820 Eu | |||
Szerződés: | 1 Sz | Életkor: | 22 év | |
ERŐ: | 122 | Magasság: | 204 cm. | |
Tehetség: | 5 |
+0
Elrejtett válaszok megtekintése: 3
A csereajánlatot elfogadták
--
72 Sz
12 n.
--
(Fordítás)
(Fordítás EN)
+0
Ezt a cserét sportszerűtlennek jelentették. A Fair play bizottság azonban úgy döntött, hogy ez a csere sportszerű.
--
72 Sz
14 n.
--
(Fordítás)
(Fordítás EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 5<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Only one team gets benefit in this trade.<br />
-- 72 Sz 14 n.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 5<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Only one team gets benefit in this trade.<br />
-- 72 Sz 14 n.
--
(Fordítás)
(Fordítás EN)
+0