交易資訊
退回
| 資訊 | |
|---|---|
| 協商開始 | 2020-04-05- 18:30 |
| 協商結束 | 2020-04-06- 11:11 |
| 限制等級 | |
|
Gerónimo Juarez | |||
| 薪資: | 10539 Eu | |||
| 合約: | 3 賽季 | 年齡: | 26 歲 | |
| RT: | 252 | 身高: | 210 cm. | |
| 潛力: | 3 | |||
|
|
Raul Aquino | |||
| 薪資: | - | |||
| 合約: | 學校新秀 | 年齡: | 17 歲 | |
| RT: | 77 | 身高: | 191 cm. | |
| 潛力: | 7 | |||
|
|
Назар Прохоров | |||
| 薪資: | 5679 Eu | |||
| 合約: | 2 賽季 | 年齡: | 28 歲 | |
| RT: | 204 | 身高: | 167 cm. | |
| 潛力: | 3 | |||
|
|
Наум Степанов | |||
| 薪資: | 9301 Eu | |||
| 合約: | 1 賽季 | 年齡: | 19 歲 | |
| RT: | 156 | 身高: | 201 cm. | |
| 潛力: | 10 | |||
1.1
交易/出借球員:
+0
2.1
顯示已隱藏回覆: 6
公平競賽委員會決定這筆交易不公平，並向球隊提出警告。
--
75 賽季
9 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 3<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 5<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 2<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
4 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- <br />
-- 75 賽季 9 天
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 3<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 5<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 2<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
4 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- <br />
-- 75 賽季 9 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
Very strange decision.
One team get a player with high potential, the second - a man who can help here and now (two other participants of trade are additional). Why is it disbalanced?
The next reason is strange and hasn't explanation.
Third reason: hàh, this argentinian player is not so strong and so cheap to say that teams from 5th division can't buy him as free agent.
Reason for me in thinking that trade was fair: both manager has expirience in game. At least one of them is from my native league and I can say that he never made anything breaking rules.
Conclusion: fair play committee should be more fair or more clear for the comunity and explane enigmatic reasons like "suspiction". -- 75 賽季 9 天
One team get a player with high potential, the second - a man who can help here and now (two other participants of trade are additional). Why is it disbalanced?
The next reason is strange and hasn't explanation.
Third reason: hàh, this argentinian player is not so strong and so cheap to say that teams from 5th division can't buy him as free agent.
Reason for me in thinking that trade was fair: both manager has expirience in game. At least one of them is from my native league and I can say that he never made anything breaking rules.
Conclusion: fair play committee should be more fair or more clear for the comunity and explane enigmatic reasons like "suspiction". -- 75 賽季 9 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+2
