交易資訊
接受
| 資訊 | |
|---|---|
| 協商開始 | 2024-09-23- 20:17 |
| 協商結束 | 2024-09-23- 22:12 |
| 限制等級 | |
|
Yuk Pang Geo
|
|||
| 薪資: | 15618 Eu | |||
| 合約: | 2 賽季 | 年齡: | 29 歲 | |
| RT: | 297 | 身高: | 216 cm. | |
| 潛力: | 3 | |||
|
Die Wu
|
|||
| 薪資: | 10304 Eu | |||
| 合約: | 4 賽季 | 年齡: | 24 歲 | |
| RT: | 262 | 身高: | 218 cm. | |
| 潛力: | 3 | |||
|
Herbertas Putinas
|
|||
| 薪資: | 7651 Eu | |||
| 合約: | 3 賽季 | 年齡: | 21 歲 | |
| RT: | 216 | 身高: | 205 cm. | |
| 潛力: | 4 | |||
|
Jaunutis Čepononis
|
|||
| 薪資: | - | |||
| 合約: | 學校新秀 | 年齡: | 18 歲 | |
| RT: | 132 | 身高: | 204 cm. | |
| 潛力: | 7 | |||
|
Nikita Łahut | |||
| 薪資: | 5933 Eu | |||
| 合約: | 1 賽季 | 年齡: | 28 歲 | |
| RT: | 238 | 身高: | 180 cm. | |
| 潛力: | 5 | |||
|
Klaudiusz Górski
|
|||
| 薪資: | 11149 Eu | |||
| 合約: | 3 賽季 | 年齡: | 21 歲 | |
| RT: | 234 | 身高: | 211 cm. | |
| 潛力: | 10 | |||
1.1
交易/出借球員:
+0
顯示已隱藏回覆: 7
This trade on paper looks far worse then it actually is.
Gorski – 10pot big, yet, undersized and with terrible health inner (-50%). Due to the way he has been trained, he will need full more ~4 seasons to improve in the needed areas and become usable in WL1 or WL2. In the end, his efficient seasons will last from age 25 to 30, max 31 – those are 6 max, far from what those could have been.
Together with Polish manager Gniewko, we have discussed the terms of this trade all offseason. My original offer involved 8-pot 360 RT peak youngster and Wu, which is the young/tall/perfectly trained center that the user has burrowed from me previously (thus, he knew the skills already):
https://www.basketpulse.com/en/Trade/information/1235897
This offer was not accepted, as Gniewko was looking for atleast 2 tall Bigs with BOTH good contracts and perfect skills. Because of that, I involved both Wu (again, perfect in age/height/contract/skills combo for any WL2 or WL3 team, no unnecessary skills keeping salary down) and Geo (tall big, needed skills, with contract below min salary). On top of that, Gniewko was looking for youth potential to stimulate this, and I had to involve either 2 7-pots or 1 8pot (I chose first option). Finally, to meet all the requirements, Polish user added salary filler on his side, which is liability on both sides that will be fired by me ASAP.
All in all, this trade works on both sides – I reduce the amount of players and gain someone that could potentially help me in following seasons, while Gniewko gets both fire-power now to fight for TOP3 in WL, as well as youth guys to use in the future. In my eyes, this is win-win and nothing else. -- 101 賽季 2 天
Gorski – 10pot big, yet, undersized and with terrible health inner (-50%). Due to the way he has been trained, he will need full more ~4 seasons to improve in the needed areas and become usable in WL1 or WL2. In the end, his efficient seasons will last from age 25 to 30, max 31 – those are 6 max, far from what those could have been.
Together with Polish manager Gniewko, we have discussed the terms of this trade all offseason. My original offer involved 8-pot 360 RT peak youngster and Wu, which is the young/tall/perfectly trained center that the user has burrowed from me previously (thus, he knew the skills already):
https://www.basketpulse.com/en/Trade/information/1235897This offer was not accepted, as Gniewko was looking for atleast 2 tall Bigs with BOTH good contracts and perfect skills. Because of that, I involved both Wu (again, perfect in age/height/contract/skills combo for any WL2 or WL3 team, no unnecessary skills keeping salary down) and Geo (tall big, needed skills, with contract below min salary). On top of that, Gniewko was looking for youth potential to stimulate this, and I had to involve either 2 7-pots or 1 8pot (I chose first option). Finally, to meet all the requirements, Polish user added salary filler on his side, which is liability on both sides that will be fired by me ASAP.
All in all, this trade works on both sides – I reduce the amount of players and gain someone that could potentially help me in following seasons, while Gniewko gets both fire-power now to fight for TOP3 in WL, as well as youth guys to use in the future. In my eyes, this is win-win and nothing else. -- 101 賽季 2 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+3
這筆交易被檢舉為不公平交易，但是公平競爭委員會決定這筆交易是公平的。
--
101 賽季
3 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0
- volunteers voted "Revert": 3
- volunteers voted "Fair": 7
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:
3 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams
-- 101 賽季 3 天
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0
- volunteers voted "Revert": 3
- volunteers voted "Fair": 7
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:
3 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams
-- 101 賽季 3 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
