交易資訊
接受
| 資訊 | |
|---|---|
| 協商開始 | 2023-03-06- 00:02 |
| 協商結束 | 2023-03-06- 00:40 |
| 限制等級 | |
|
Chak Hung Tai
|
|||
| 薪資: | - | |||
| 合約: | 學校新秀 | 年齡: | 15 歲 | |
| RT: | 62 | 身高: | 189 cm. | |
| 潛力: | 8 | |||
|
Yan Shing Mung
|
|||
| 薪資: | - | |||
| 合約: | 學校新秀 | 年齡: | 15 歲 | |
| RT: | 60 | 身高: | 197 cm. | |
| 潛力: | 8 | |||
|
Peng Zuo | |||
| 薪資: | 29568 Eu | |||
| 合約: | 5 賽季 | 年齡: | 28 歲 | |
| RT: | 315 | 身高: | 201 cm. | |
| 潛力: | 3 | |||
交易/出借球員:
+0
1.1
1.1
顯示已隱藏回覆: 7
i think we need the rule that meet the modern pricipe of the law not medieval. In our days if you say someone is quilt you have to prove his quilt , in medieval if you say someone is quilt he must prove he is not quilt. So i think, it would be great idea if someone blames unfair trade. The submitter and his reason should be announced in public. For example" i sabas blame this trade unfair because this is already 6th time your during trades tat goes to one side" . Because now you just can push the button with no reason. For example this trade.... in your opinion who is who? Who was robed , and who is clear winner in this situation? i see win win, and u. who put the charges ? And what was the reason? That you do not like monarch? I'm also not his number one fan, but there is no need to blame the rules and trades when everything seams to be ok
--
92 賽季
1 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+2
這筆交易被檢舉為不公平交易，但是公平競爭委員會決定這筆交易是公平的。
--
92 賽季
2 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 15<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
<br />
-- 92 賽季 2 天
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 15<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
<br />
-- 92 賽季 2 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
