記者會
1.1
交易/出借球員:
球隊提出交易請求
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易參與者的訊息 Da li te zanima da se trejdujemo, treba mi domaci igrac
--
84 賽季
1 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
84 賽季
1 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
84 賽季
1 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
這筆交易被檢舉為不公平交易，但是公平競爭委員會決定這筆交易是公平的。
--
84 賽季
2 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 4<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 6<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
2 - Salary drop (one or more useful players are exchanged for useless player(s) with the only goal to reduce salaries)<br />
<br />
-- 84 賽季 2 天
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 4<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 6<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
2 - Salary drop (one or more useful players are exchanged for useless player(s) with the only goal to reduce salaries)<br />
<br />
-- 84 賽季 2 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0