記者會

球隊提出交易請求
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0


交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
76 賽季
29 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0


交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
76 賽季
29 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0


交易已接受
--
76 賽季
29 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0


Nice trade.
--
76 賽季
29 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+2


nice one but not for everyone...
--
76 賽季
29 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+1


交易已被公平遊戲委員會撤銷
--
76 賽季
30 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0


公平競賽委員會決定這筆交易不公平,並向球隊提出警告。
--
76 賽季
30 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0


How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 9<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 1<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
4 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- <br />
-- 76 賽季 30 天
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 9<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 1<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
4 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- <br />
-- 76 賽季 30 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0