How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 7<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 3<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
4 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Salary drop (one or more useful players are exchanged for useless player(s) with the only goal to reduce salaries)<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- This trade is extremely unbalanced.<br />
--
74 S
14 j.
Tai kaip man issikeist zaidejus? Kokias cia nesamones darot? Jai as noriu atleist savo zaideja bet brangu tai geriau pasiimsiu lavonus ir atleisiu po savaites. Tai db isvis hu*ne kaskokia. Abi puses buvo patenkintos ir aktyvus zaidejai...
--
74 S
14 j.
--
(Traduire) (Traduire EN)
+6
First of all, the player which you think is to good for me is 70% health and badly trained. And those SG players who you think is "trash", was really important for me in this season. But i was ready to tank my season so i can raise more high pot players, and that player is gonna need all season to get his health to 80%. I admit that player vise those 3 player don't match the one i got, but the i have a question for you, do player who is going to BANKRUPT can try to do something about it? Nobody is going to give him a good pot player (unless old one) for that SF, cause he is overpaid and unhealthy. So this trade was desperate for the team.
--
74 S
14 j.
Échange/Prêt de joueurs: 
5.3
https://www.basketpulse.com/lt/Trade/information/972357
--
74 S
14 j.
