Información de intercambios
Revertido
| Informacion | |
|---|---|
| Inicio de la negociación | 2021-01-01- 16:19 |
| Fin de la negociación | 2021-01-01- 19:42 |
| Nivel de restricciones | |
|
Ralfs Bullītis | |||
| Salario: | - | |||
| Contrato: | T. escolar | Edad: | 17 Edad | |
| RT: | 34 | Altura: | 192 cm. | |
| Potencial: | 2 | |||
|
|
Alberts Grafs | |||
| Salario: | - | |||
| Contrato: | T. escolar | Edad: | 14 Edad | |
| RT: | 23 | Altura: | 185 cm. | |
| Potencial: | 3 | |||
|
|
Dagnis Vijolnieks | |||
| Salario: | - | |||
| Contrato: | T. escolar | Edad: | 14 Edad | |
| RT: | 20 | Altura: | 178 cm. | |
| Potencial: | 3 | |||
|
|
Jimmy Sparrow | |||
| Salario: | - | |||
| Contrato: | T. escolar | Edad: | 16 Edad | |
| RT: | 72 | Altura: | 180 cm. | |
| Potencial: | 8 | |||
1.1
Intercambio/Jugadores para prestámos:
+0
1.1
Mostrar respuestas ocultas: 5
El comercio ha sido revertido por el comité del "juego limpio"
--
79 S
26 Dia
--
(Traducir)
(Traducir EN)
+0
El comité de juego limpio decidió que el intercambio es injusto y los equipos reciben una advertencia.
--
79 S
26 Dia
--
(Traducir)
(Traducir EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
3 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- <br />
-- 79 S 26 Dia
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
3 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- <br />
-- 79 S 26 Dia
--
(Traducir)
(Traducir EN)
+0
