Press conference

-- 57 S 7 d.
You gotta love it, up by 9 in the 4th quarter with 2 minutes to go and my team turns it over 3 straight possessions to let the other team in. 16 secs left I go up 3 and tactical foul. Up 1 with 7 seconds and I am fouled. My guy goes 1/2 so it puts me up by 2 and he shoots a 3 to win the game.

Its really nice that my offense and defense are considerably better than my opponents yet he magically has the same number of turnovers as me. His offensive avg 7.5 and defensive avg 7.4 and mine are 8.4 and 8.4 but our turnovers are the same because of something as stupid as experience. We could go on and talk about how I was leading in ranking as well but whats the point.....
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
then there is always this shit too

Close range 2PT shot: P. Pavoni ( Good situation)
Players skills' ratio: -3; Shot quality ratio: 1 Defender: M. Vernon
3PT shot: T. Prokos ( Good situation)
Players skills' ratio: -2; Shot quality ratio: 1 Defender: Q. Xi
Mid-range 2PT shot: M. Roy ( Good situation)
Players skills' ratio: -3; Shot quality ratio: 2 Defender: A. Lun
Close range 2PT shot: D. Sbrozzi ( Good situation)
Players skills' ratio: -3; Shot quality ratio: 2 Defender: Z. Lang
Close range 2PT shot: D. Sbrozzi ( Good situation)
Players skills' ratio: -3; Shot quality ratio: 2 Defender: M. Vernon
Mid-range 2PT shot: M. Vaya ( Excellent situation)
Players skills' ratio: -4; Shot quality ratio: 3 Defender: J. Gavell
Close range 2PT shot: N. Ragozzino ( Good situation)
Players skills' ratio: -3; Shot quality ratio: 2 Defender: M. Vernon
Mid-range 2PT shot: M. Baldi ( Good situation)
Players skills' ratio: -3; Shot quality ratio: 2 Defender: D. Knight
Close range 2PT shot: T. Prokos ( Good situation)
Players skills' ratio: -3; Shot quality ratio: 2 Defender: D. Knight

vs

Accurate 3PT shot. Good psychological preparation definitely helped: J. Osborne ( Average situation)
Players skills' ratio: 1; Shot quality ratio: -3 Defender: P. Balouzos
Lucky mid-range 2PT shot: A. Lun ( Bad situation)
Players skills' ratio: 1; Shot quality ratio: -3 Defender: M. Baldi
Close range 2PT shot: J. Osborne ( Good situation)
Players skills' ratio: -3; Shot quality ratio: 1 Defender: D. Sbrozzi
By miracle accurate 3PT shot: J. Osborne ( Good situation)
Players skills' ratio: 1; Shot quality ratio: -3 Defender: P. Balouzos -- 57 S 7 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
why even bother training defense if all you get is this crap shoot and the tally for those of you counting

19 points for panthers vs 10 points for JBM on made buckets with unfavorable settings. -- 57 S 7 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
In my game the tactical foul never happened!! I was 3 up, and it took 12 secs for the foul and this was made on the opponents 3 point shot!!! 4 point play and goodbye victory :) -- 57 S 7 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+2
Ive had something similar happen as well, its so frustrating -- 57 S 7 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Bloomis, but that's the point of setting tactics. He made those shots from wide open situations, so it is quite logical, though I agree that it really sucks when well trained players don't seem to help. -- 57 S 7 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
Been there, done that so much I consider quitting more than staying. But it is explained in the forums. Look for posts by me, Frankebasta, and at least 1 other I forget. The results are made based on RT, then the play by play is generated to match. Hence, the weird stats. -- 57 S 8 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
Send me a link Wizards? -- 57 S 8 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
superdzonis I agree being "wide open" should improve shots but it should be countered by the skill of the defender on how "wide open" they are. Otherwise what stops a WL4 team from consistently beating a WL1 team if it is dominated by tactics alone. Especially in something as neutral defensively as a 3-2 zone and against well trained athletic and high defensive players he shouldn't be able to get into wide open situations... -- 57 S 8 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
Why do you compare yourself to WL1 team here? The opponent has an average RT which is higher than yours by 30. I agree that it is not the key parameter, but the difference is, anyway, HUGE, as one famous person says. And he has a bunch of old guys which kind of proposes that he has a lot more experienced team than yours. Experience, is one of the main factors behind wide open shots at least as I see it. -- 57 S 8 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
Um it's higher because I have 8 players and he has 9 so the avg is skewed. My avg is 292 and his is 289... -- 57 S 8 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
I was simply saying that it should be an equal balance between tactics and skill of opponent otherwise there is no reason a WL 1 team with appropriate tactics could lose to a WL 4 team it was an exaggeration. -- 57 S 8 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
His average rate for the game was 293, yours 291. -- 57 S 8 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
And also, I think we overvalue the skill ratio as it only includes athleticism, shooting and shot def. But offensive skills, XP, Def IQ governs how players are able to recognise opportunities for open shots and create good scoring chances. For example, http://www.bballzone.net/lt/Rungtynes-chronologija-9572672.htm throughout the game I took only 6 shots with skills ratio above 0, but lost only by 4 points in away game. I think tactics added up with skills not depicted in skills ratio and it led to quite a good game. -- 57 S 8 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
I understand what you are saying, but shouldn't athleticism and shot defense determine how wide open a shot is, not just tactics -- 57 S 8 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
No, it shouldn't be connected. If you are DeAndre Jordan, it doesn't mean that your opponents will not take open shots. Shot def and athl I would say, don't have much correlation to how the team is creating shot opportunities. -- 57 S 8 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
sure it does, the defenders ability to close out and contest the shot is purely based on his defensive awareness (Defense skill) and his ability to get to the shooter (athleticism). This becomes increasingly more important if the defensive set is a zone -- 57 S 8 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
I think you both are right, it all depends on which aspect of the game you are looking at. -- 57 S 8 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
I think it was this game that made bloomis get out -- 57 S 10 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
Rt is a lie -- 57 S 10 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+2
I think it was the game after that, look at the fourth quarter.he was still trying to fix his teams flaws after this (not enough offensive oriented players). He was also discussing the 21u team. One big reason probably more than any was that he was getting married next month and was busy preparing for that is what he messaged me. -- 57 S 10 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+2
....so the problem turns out not to be RT,but RL :) -- 57 S 10 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1