Press conference

Icon Trade/Lending players: supers & Marko(Clos
-- 55 S 35 d.
Uo, labai teisingas sprendimas.
Beprotiškai nesąžiningi mainai ir labai greita adminų reakcija.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+2
Which are the criteria for an "unfair" exchange? I also offered 3 of my players (Zha, Stavropoulos, Altabas) for Konstantineas, but he rejected my offer. In case he had accepted it, I was also going to get a ban and lose players????? :o Also too bad that a rising greek team is closed now :( -- 55 S 35 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+2
dar vienas akivaizdus pvz apie ydinga tvarka kai nacionalinis čempionatas neturi reikšmės -- 55 S 36 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
Kavala, what do you mean by 'rising greek team'? :D Marko was simply a duplicate team of superflights. Or at least they had really close connections as both of Marko's great scouted talents quickly ended up in the hands of superflight for a crapy return. -- 55 S 36 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
受益方只是挂猪头没被ban，不对啊。这丫的猖狂n赛季了 -- 55 S 36 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
drunkmanx3, your offer was way better than the one he accepted, BUT i guess he needed greek players, not 3 extra foreigners.. -- 55 S 36 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
此时此刻，值得来杯嘉士伯 -- 55 S 36 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
Wouldn't be better if there was a kind of system that would not permit this kind of exchanges (obviously setting some qualifications for acceptable terms) instead of destroying teams after allegedly unacceptable trades? -- 55 S 37 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
It would be very complicated to contruct such system and in addition, it was not the only trade between those teams that was unfair. http://www.bballzone.net/lt/MainuLangas-informacija-797501.htm The admins evaluate not only trades, but PM and IP logs as well, which may have influenced that decision. It seems to be a duplicate team of superflights, that's why Marko was closed. -- 55 S 37 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
I see your point. I am not saying it was an unfair decision, just tried to propose an alternative that could make the game less negatively surprising. I myself got punished some years ago for something that I have not understood yet... somebody who never appeared as a game user, allegedly used the same IP with me and I (not s/he, I) lost players and some thousands of money... so I guess, if Supers is accused for what it seems, the punishment is not that harsh.
In any case, the exchange system can take some improvements. I don't see the reason for some of the limits that there exist. And I see many good reasons to add up some new limits... the ones that justify this kind of punishments -- 55 S 37 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1