Press conference

Icon Trade/Lending players: Maia BC & Toronto
-- 105 S 4 d.
Team made a trade offer
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Player: Valentim Garcia
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 105 S 5 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Player: João Pinho
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 105 S 5 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Player: Yung-Jen Guan
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 105 S 5 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Trade offer accepted -- 105 S 5 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
I don't understand why someone would vote against this trade. The reasoning behind it seems pretty clear.
The coach of Toronto put Yung-Jen on the trade available, and since he's in WL3, i assume it's for financial reasons, the player is clearly good enough to make an impact in that league.
My team is currently in WL2 and now has the financial flexibility to accommodate higher salaries, so I made an offer: a solid WL3-level player in the final year of his contract with a lower salary (which helps the other team rebuild quickly), plus a player with 6 potential and a decent predicted RT. That so i get a very good player to help me in my WL2 journey and with some potential to be better.

To me, it's a fair deal and beneficial for both sides. -- 105 S 7 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
This trade was reported as unfair. However, the Fair play committee decided that this trade is fair. -- 105 S 7 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0
- volunteers voted "Revert": 0
- volunteers voted "Fair": 7

These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:

 -- 105 S 7 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0