Press conference

Icon Trade/Lending players: Slavia & SeeRaiwer
-- 91 S 3 d.
Team made a trade offer
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Player: TianQi Liao
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 91 S 3 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Player: Tom Novosel
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 91 S 3 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Player: Miloš Michal
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 91 S 3 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Player: Dovydas Girskis
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 91 S 3 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Player: Jacques Delmas
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 91 S 3 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Trade offer accepted -- 91 S 3 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Trade is reported.
So my explanation is simple. Just standard trade - several solid players for one better. My players have peak 275-307. Delmas has 345 (but only 90% health). All players in this trade have bad inner potential for health. And all have solid other potentials. Delmas is big, that´s what I like him. He is 3pt shooter. And I have many young prospects. So I want less and better players. I think it is good trade for both teams. -- 91 S 4 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
This trade was reported as unfair. However, the Fair play committee decided that this trade is fair. -- 91 S 5 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert and punish&quot;: 0<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert&quot;: 0<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Fair&quot;: 14<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Trade constitutes a &quot;hidden lending&quot; (player(s) that changed team went back to the original team)<br />
<br />
 -- 91 S 5 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0