Press conference
1.1
Trade/Lending players:
Team made a trade offer
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
90 S
17 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
90 S
17 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
90 S
17 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
1.1
Who reported this? He should be warned or punished. This person is irrational and crazy to abuse the FPC system, breaking the peace of this game community.
--
90 S
30 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+1
I get talent who will be useful after many seasons. And give ready to play player + weaker talent than I get. I save money + get better talent. Other team get stronger.
I play in high level for more seasons. So really know that need for my team's future.
Also game owner let all users improve trade level(for buying credits) to make trades easier. Thanks. -- 90 S 30 d.
I play in high level for more seasons. So really know that need for my team's future.
Also game owner let all users improve trade level(for buying credits) to make trades easier. Thanks. -- 90 S 30 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+1
1.1
And a lot more of this type of trade have done in our community since users can update their trade level to 10, some were reported and some weren’t, and many of them were done between WL1 and WL2 teams. So should we reconsider if this type of trade is unfair when it is becoming normal in our community and the trade actually helps both teams in result? And many time we are talking about relating our game to the reality, this type of trade is common in the NBA too, where teams can use their trade exception to trade future draft picks for players that help the teams win now.
--
90 S
30 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+1
Personally, I don't think this type of transaction has much of a problem with level 10.
But the double standards of some FPC members once again feel unfair. -- 90 S 30 d.
But the double standards of some FPC members once again feel unfair. -- 90 S 30 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+1
This trade was reported as unfair. However, the Fair play committee decided that this trade is fair.
--
90 S
30 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 12<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Salary drop (one or more useful players are exchanged for useless player(s) with the only goal to reduce salaries)<br />
<br />
-- 90 S 30 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 12<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Salary drop (one or more useful players are exchanged for useless player(s) with the only goal to reduce salaries)<br />
<br />
-- 90 S 30 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0