Press conference
Trade/Lending players:
Team made a trade offer
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
88 S
20 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
88 S
20 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
88 S
20 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
88 S
20 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Trade offer accepted
--
88 S
20 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Had two great centers, so was able to offer the second best for a player in difderent position. Having 2 PF players was also not an option to pay salary to 4 good big guys, with obvious gap in Small forward and Shooting guard. This trade solved lack of smaller guys, as well as gives flexibility for next year budgeting.
--
88 S
21 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
I took on salary and gave up the best player in order to get 2 guys with more potential for future seasons. I might have taken on too much salary with the center but was looking for a young big with potential for awhile.
--
88 S
21 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Trade has been reverted by the "Fair play" committee
--
88 S
21 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
The Fair play committee decided that the trade is unfair and teams are given a warning.
--
88 S
21 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 8<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 3<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
8 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
-- 88 S 21 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 8<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 3<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
8 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
-- 88 S 21 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0