Press conference
1.1
Trade/Lending players:
Team made a trade offer
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
88 S
13 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
88 S
13 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
88 S
13 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
1.1
Peak RT 352 traded for 300 and 286, without cutting salary? Its goal to help only one team, unfair. Revert.
--
88 S
14 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+4
This trade was reported as unfair. However, the Fair play committee decided that this trade is fair.
--
88 S
14 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 6<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
-- 88 S 14 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 6<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
-- 88 S 14 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
1.1
Restrictions' level
6
Calculations
7 Based on teams restrictions' levels
-1 Teams are related (use similar or the same IP)
wait, what?! -- 88 S 15 d.
6
Calculations
7 Based on teams restrictions' levels
-1 Teams are related (use similar or the same IP)
wait, what?! -- 88 S 15 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+6
same ip to do the trade,it's very hard to clear that if they are related.if they are related teams,it should be punish for both teams.at least to be reverted because the same ip
--
88 S
15 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+3
Just check the other team and see its past four trades which were all reverted. Weren’t those all ridiculous offers? Don’t see any reasons that he should accept those offers other than trying to help the other teams. It should’ve been punished in the first place. Instead of punishing, FPC just kept reverting the trade, and here is this trade that I just found the trade level was 6 because of the same IP for both users and one of them is a FPC member. So Maniacs you will say I don’t have the right to report such suspicious trade?
--
88 S
15 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+3
You may say I want to “revenge” but I didn’t report the trade right away because I didn’t notice that the two team were using the same IP. And yes, I will say I offer much better players for Liang IMO and still didn’t get him, but this is not the reason I report your trade, it is because you were using the same IP and previous weird moves of the other team, of course he can turn down my offers for worse offers, it is his player, as long as the trade is fair. If you think I should be warned by the FPC because I report your suspicious actions in the game, you may need to step down from your position in FPC because you are willing to take advantage of it instead of improving the game environment.
--
88 S
15 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+1
https://www.basketpulse.com/tw/Trade/information/1109264 FPC approves FPC members on simiilar IP trade?
FPC should investigate this case seriously.
After reverting a trade, FPC members should avoid trading the same players immediately.
Internal guidelines on more strict control over FPC members' trades should be enforced. -- 88 S 32 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+2
