Press conference
1.1
Trade/Lending players:
Team made a trade offer
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
84 S
14 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
84 S
14 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
84 S
14 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
84 S
14 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
This trade was reported as unfair. However, the Fair play committee decided that this trade is fair.
--
84 S
19 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 4<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 6<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
<br />
-- 84 S 19 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 4<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 6<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
<br />
-- 84 S 19 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0