Press conference
Trade/Lending players:
Team made a trade offer
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
79 S
32 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
79 S
32 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Trade offer accepted
--
79 S
32 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Trade has been reverted by the "Fair play" committee
--
79 S
33 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
The Fair play committee decided that the trade is unfair and teams are given a warning.
--
79 S
33 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 11<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
3 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
3 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
3 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Young high potential is not worth old guy<br />
--- Old player 1s contract for high potential youngster with long contract..<br />
--- Talent level of players involved is too far apart. Trade needs to involved another player or two to make the talent gap closer.<br />
-- 79 S 33 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 11<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
3 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
3 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
3 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Young high potential is not worth old guy<br />
--- Old player 1s contract for high potential youngster with long contract..<br />
--- Talent level of players involved is too far apart. Trade needs to involved another player or two to make the talent gap closer.<br />
-- 79 S 33 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0