Press conference
Trade/Lending players:
Team made a trade offer
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
77 S
5 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
77 S
5 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
77 S
5 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
77 S
5 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Trade offer accepted
--
77 S
5 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
I didnt need a 10 pot pg because my signature player is a pg so I traded him for a future 307 vk sg/sf position player. Xia is trash just like the Estonian player (similar quality). Sg/sf 9pot for a 10 pot short pg is an equal trade imo. Both are not with the best inners supposingly.
--
77 S
5 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
7 pot player also with good Big man inners
--
77 S
5 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Trade has been reverted by the "Fair play" committee
--
77 S
10 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
The Fair play committee decided that the trade is unfair and teams are given a warning.
--
77 S
10 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 5<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
3 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Suspicion of a trade with fake team or inactive user<br />
<br />
-- 77 S 10 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 5<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
3 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Suspicion of a trade with fake team or inactive user<br />
<br />
-- 77 S 10 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
What a joke :D
--
77 S
11 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Tell me how a fair trade should look like?
--
77 S
11 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
dont include pot 10 and all should be fine :) pot 10 players allowed to have only for wl1 teams...
--
77 S
11 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+4
Fantastic. So I should just let him go, because I don't have a privilege to keep two 10 pot pgs in my team.
--
77 S
11 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
if your 10 pot trade didn't go through you can always trade him to 
https://www.basketpulse.com/lt/Team/36882/description
--
77 S
11 d.
https://www.basketpulse.com/lt/Team/36882/description
--
77 S
11 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+3
Sure, we can do that
--
77 S
11 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Great idea!
--
77 S
11 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
!!!
--
77 S
11 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
???
--
77 S
11 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
...
--
77 S
11 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Whts up
--
77 S
11 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
2.2
Whats happening
--
77 S
11 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Baudu baudele
--
77 S
11 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Ziauru
--
77 S
11 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Beleka
--
77 S
11 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0