Press conference
Trade/Lending players:
Team made a trade offer
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
76 S
4 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
76 S
4 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
76 S
4 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
76 S
4 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
6.15
This trade was reported as unfair. However, the Fair play committee decided that this trade is fair.
--
76 S
5 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 5<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 6<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Young school talent (10pot) traded for good (8pot) player and random 6pot is not very high return. Should be at least similar level talent added in return for such school player.<br />
-- 76 S 5 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 5<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 6<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Young school talent (10pot) traded for good (8pot) player and random 6pot is not very high return. Should be at least similar level talent added in return for such school player.<br />
-- 76 S 5 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
https://www.basketpulse.com/lt/Trade/information/986363 :D
--
76 S
6 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+5
2.2
An 8-potential+6-potential can be exchanged for a 10-potential Miao. This is the privilege of one's own officials in North Korea. Where is fairness?
--
76 S
6 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+3
Nesikisu as i mainus, bet cia jau net man gaila CO. tureciau tyleti nes Benio zaideja turiu pasiskolines, mainai neliecia manes, bet procentaliai ar cia nedidesnis salary dropas? ir gaunamas 10 pot zaidejas. Negrazu net man tokie mainai.
--
76 S
6 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+3
Nesikisu as i mainus, bet cia jau net man gaila CO.
--
76 S
6 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+2
I think FPC has a problem of double standarts. If somebody asks me, I would say that this trade is fair. Why should we care about 10pot midget? But on other hand: a lot of similiar looking trades have been reverted.
--
76 S
6 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+1
Maybe it's time to create FPC² to control FPC
--
76 S
6 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+10
Good idea !!!
--
76 S
6 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+1
