Press conference

Icon Trade/Lending players: Reapers & CV Lions
-- 72 S 31 d.
Team made a trade offer
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Player:
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 72 S 32 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Player:
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 72 S 32 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Player:
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 72 S 32 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Player:
Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 72 S 32 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Trade offer accepted -- 72 S 32 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
This trade was reported as unfair. However, the Fair play committee decided that this trade is fair. -- 72 S 34 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert and punish&quot;: 0<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert&quot;: 2<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Fair&quot;: 7<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players&#39; trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- 217cm players with a potential 9 are at a premium and the deal does not compensate for this. Essentially a trade of a 195cm player for a 217cm occurred and he also incurs more monthly salaries.<br />
 -- 72 S 34 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0