Trade information
Accepted
| Information | |
|---|---|
| Start forhandling | 2019-10-04- 16:23 |
| Slut handlen | 2019-10-04- 18:30 |
| Restrictions' level | |
|
André Duchene | |||
| Løn: | 7808 Eu | |||
| Kontrakt: | 2 S | Alder: | 19 y. | |
| RT: | 135 | Højte: | 198 cm. | |
| Potentiale: | 9 | |||
|
|
Thibaut Barbier | |||
| Løn: | 4350 Eu | |||
| Kontrakt: | 5 S | Alder: | 23 y. | |
| RT: | 165 | Højte: | 205 cm. | |
| Potentiale: | 7 | |||
|
|
Brunonas Meškinis | |||
| Løn: | 1820 Eu | |||
| Kontrakt: | 1 S | Alder: | 22 y. | |
| RT: | 122 | Højte: | 204 cm. | |
| Potentiale: | 5 | |||
2.2
Byttehandel/Udlåning af spillere:
+0
Vis skjulte svar: 3
Trade offer accepted
--
72 S
12 Dag
--
(Oversæt)
(Oversæt EN)
+0
This trade was reported as unfair. However, the Fair play committee decided that this trade is fair.
--
72 S
14 Dag
--
(Oversæt)
(Oversæt EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 5<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Only one team gets benefit in this trade.<br />
-- 72 S 14 Dag
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 5<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Only one team gets benefit in this trade.<br />
-- 72 S 14 Dag
--
(Oversæt)
(Oversæt EN)
+0
