新闻发布中心

Icon 交易/租借球员: ASKDaugava & Banana
-- 79 季 26 天
球队提出了交易报价
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
球员:
交易完成后效力新球队 -- 79 季 26 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
球员:
交易完成后效力新球队 -- 79 季 26 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
球员:
交易完成后效力新球队 -- 79 季 26 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
球员:
交易完成后效力新球队 -- 79 季 26 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
接受交易报价 -- 79 季 26 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
交易被公平竞争委员会撤销 -- 79 季 26 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
公平竞赛委员会决定交易不公平,并给予球队警告。 -- 79 季 26 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert and punish&quot;: 2<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert&quot;: 6<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Fair&quot;: 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade&rsquo;s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
3 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players&#39; trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- <br />
-- 79 季 26 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0