記者會

Icon 交易/租借球員: Flox Team & Kaimas
-- 85 賽季 6 天
球隊提出交易請求
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
球員:
交易後開始在新球隊比賽 -- 85 賽季 6 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
球員:
交易後開始在新球隊比賽 -- 85 賽季 6 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
球員:
交易後開始在新球隊比賽 -- 85 賽季 6 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
交易已接受 -- 85 賽季 6 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
siuuuuuuuuu -- 85 賽季 6 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
What is the problem ? Why someone report this trade ? -- 85 賽季 7 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+1
I don't see any problems there. Should be counted as fair. -- 85 賽季 7 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+1
交易已被公平競賽委員會退回 -- 85 賽季 7 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
公平競賽委員會決定這筆交易不公平，並向球隊提出警告。 -- 85 賽季 7 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert and punish&quot;: 0<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert&quot;: 7<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Fair&quot;: 3<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
4 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players&#39; trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
3 - Suspicion that trade&rsquo;s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
 -- 85 賽季 7 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
WHAT -- 85 賽季 7 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
What a joke !! -- 85 賽季 8 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+1